Workbench
Different systems. Shared direction.
A fictional preview of one design rule: the interface may not manufacture the authority, evidence, capability, or certainty needed to justify its own action. Change a condition. Watch what the record refuses to invent.
Component comparison
Should this component move to technical review?
Example C-17. You are comparing a proposed frame brace for a fictional motorcycle. Specifications, requirements, and an open question do not live in the same place.
1 of 3 example requirements present
EXAMPLE / ON HOLD
01 Request
Decide whether brace FB-17 can move from a proposal to a technical review.
02 Relevant context
Exemplar motorcycle MX-4. Proposed part FB-17, lower mount, fictional geometry.
03 Sources
Frame note MX-4-F and the proposer sketch. No shop system is connected.
04 Assumptions
The sketch is only a proposal.
05 Missing information
Specification on file · Open question resolved
06 Boundary
The review stops here.
07 Human review
Waiting on the missing fact.
08 Evidence
The record on the right is the whole result. External action: none.
Changing this example does not establish fitment, approve a component, or control equipment.